NCP-US Exam Dumps, NCP-US Practice Test Questions
PDF (New 2023) Actual Nutanix NCP-US Exam Questions
NEW QUESTION # 10
An administrator configured WORM on an existing Objects bucket at 4 p.m. on Monday. During the configuration, the administrator did not select Enable Version. At 8 a.m. the next morning, a ticket was submitted to update the bucket to include versioning.
What are the correct steps to make the requested change?
- A. Create a new' bucket with Enable Version selected and migrate all data since versioning cannot be changed after 12 hours once WORM is enabled.
- B. Create a bucket with Enable Version selected and migrate all data since versioning cannot be changed immediately after WORM is enabled.
- C. update the WORM settings to Enable Version as that setting can be turned on at any point after WORM is enabled.
- D. Disable WORM and reconfigure with Enable Version and Enable WORM checked as it has been less than 24 hours since WORM was enabled.
Answer: D
Explanation:
According to the Nutanix Unified Storage (NCP-US) v6 documentation, once WORM (Write-Once-Read-Many) has been enabled on an Objects bucket, versioning cannot be immediately enabled. Instead, the WORM configuration must be disabled and then re-enabled, this time with Enable Version and Enable WORM checked. Since the administrator did not select Enable Version during the initial configuration, this step is necessary in order to enable versioning.
https://portal.nutanix.com/page/documents/solutions/details?targetId=NVD-2151-Unified-Storage:data-immutability-and-versioning.html You can disable WORM within 24 hours of enabling it on a bucket1. This will allow you to change the versioning settings on the bucket.
NEW QUESTION # 11
A developer has finished developing a new eCommerce site that is broken out into several different Kubernetes pods. In order to promote the new application to production, a storage location for static content that the site uses needs to be defined in the file.
Application requirements:
WORM
Replication
Which solution should the administrator choose?
- A. Files with NFS
- B. Volumes
- C. Files with SMB
- D. Objects
Answer: D
Explanation:
Object storage is a good fit for applications that require versioning, replication, and a write-once-read-many (WORM) access model. Since eCommerce sites often store a large amount of unstructured data such as images, videos, and other multimedia content, object storage can provide a scalable, cost-effective, and highly available solution.
Object storage is also a good fit for Kubernetes-based applications that use microservices architecture, as objects can be accessed from multiple pods at the same time, without the need for complex file system sharing. Additionally, object storage can be easily integrated with Kubernetes using operators or API calls.
On the other hand, while volumes and file storage solutions such as SMB and NFS can also store static content, they may not be the best fit for the given application requirements. Volumes are often limited in terms of scalability and replication, while file storage solutions may not provide the same level of versioning and WORM capabilities as object storage.
As a result, the best solution for the given application requirements is Object storage.
Note that the exact implementation and configuration of the object storage solution may vary based on factors such as performance, availability, and security requirements.
https://next.nutanix.com/community-blog-154/maintaining-compliance-with-worm-for-nutanix-objects-33239
NEW QUESTION # 12
An administrator is upgrading Files. When running the preupgrade check, the following message is generated:
Fileserver in HA state
Which two steps should the administrator take to resolve this error message? (Choose two.)
- A. Verify FSVM is booted and not stuck.
- B. Check for alerts for NVM being down.
- C. Check if Zookeeper services are running.
- D. Check if Stargate services are running,
Answer: A,C
Explanation:
These steps are based on a guide from Nutanix on how to troubleshoot pre-upgrade checks failure for Nutanix Files1. The guide states that one possible cause of this error message is that Nutanix files node (fsvms) might not be up or accessible1. The guide also suggests checking if Zookeeper services are running on all FSVMs as part of the troubleshooting process1.
NEW QUESTION # 13
Refer the exhibit
When creating an Object Store. an administrator receives an error. as shown in the exhibit.
How should the administrator resolve the error?
- A. Provide required IP addresses in a list format.
- B. Select a different subnet
- C. Provide required IP addresses in CIDR format.
- D. Select different address
Answer: C
Explanation:
According to Nutanix Support & Insights1, "The IP address consumption for the objects infra network is as follows: ... From DHCP Pool: Each Worker VM requires one IP Address." Therefore, the administrator should provide a range of IP addresses in CIDR notation (for example, 10.0.0.0/24) that can be used by the Objects worker VMs.
https://portal.nutanix.com/page/documents/solutions/details?targetId=NVD-2151-Unified-Storage:nutanix-objects.html
NEW QUESTION # 14
An administrator has mapped a Volume Group named VGI to a VM, Due to changes in the application running inside the VM, two additional volumes are required. At the time of creation, the VM was assigned to a Protection Domain named PDI.
Which two steps should the administrator take to add the additional volumes to the VM while maintaining data protection? (Choose two.)
- A. Manually update PD1 to include the newly created vDisks.
- B. Map the new vDisks as volumes to the VM.
- C. Add two additional vDisks to VG1.
- D. Add the new vDisks to the same Consistency Group.
Answer: C,D
Explanation:
To add additional volumes to a VM that is mapped to a VG, you need to add more vDisks to that VG1. vDisks are virtual disks that reside on Storage Containers2.
To maintain data protection for a VM that is assigned to a Protection Domain (PD), you need to add any new vDisks to the same Consistency Group (CG) as the existing ones3. A CG is a subset of entities in a PD that are snapshotted in a crash-consistent manner2.
NEW QUESTION # 15
When completing the Linux Client iSCSI discovery process of the Nutanix cluster Volumes target, which action should an administrator complete first?
- A. Establish connection to the Volumes target.
- B. Restart iSCSI service on CVM.
- C. Discover the Volumes target.
- D. Ensure the iSCSI is started.
Answer: D
Explanation:
To use Nutanix Volumes with Linux clients, you must install and configure an iSCSI initiator on each client." Therefore, the administrator should ensure that the iSCSI service is started on the Linux client before discovering or connecting to the Volumes target.
https://next.nutanix.com/installation-configuration-23/data-services-ip-iscsi-33804
NEW QUESTION # 16
An administrator needs to configure a service to collect data from a forensic software package that audits client access to a specific location. Data need to be immutable, Which option meets these requirements?
- A. Configure WORM options to an Objects bucket.
- B. Configure an Objects bucket with versioning.
- C. Configure an Objects bucket with the Expire current objects lifecycle policy enabled
- D. Configure standard Objects bucket with the read-on)' attribute enabled.
Answer: A
Explanation:
WORM stands for write once, read many, and it is a feature that prevents deletion or modification of object data1. Nutanix Objects supports WORM with industry-recognized security standards1.
NEW QUESTION # 17
An administrator receive a warning message concerning a file server hosted in a 3-node cluster. On the Files Console Dashboard tab, the file server displays a warning to recommend performance optimization, How should the administrator resolve this issue?
- A. Apply the recommendation to rebalance,
- B. Scale out adding a new FSVM in the cluster.
- C. Scale up the FSVM'5 resources.
- D. Increase the CVM's CPU and RAM.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Nutanix Files can automatically rebalance data across FSVMs to optimize performance and capacity utilization. You can also manually trigger a rebalance from the Files Console Dashboard tab by clicking on Apply Recommendation. https://next.nutanix.com/community-blog-154/nutanix-files-4-0-new-features-performance-improvements-40544
NEW QUESTION # 18
A company uses a Nutanix 3-node cluster environment. In Prism Pro, the Capacity Runway shows these capacity values:
Max Capacity: 6 TiB
Effective Capacity 4 TiB
The company wants to upgrade the environment to use an RF3 container and also requires all cluster nodes to be the same model, What must the effective capacity Of the Nutanix cluster be to support the new RF3 container?
- A. 4 TiB
- B. 10 TIB
- C. 6 TiB
- D. 9 TiB
Answer: D
Explanation:
To support a new RF3 container, the effective capacity of the Nutanix cluster must be at least three times the size of the data that needs to be stored on it3. This is because RF3 means that each data block is replicated three times across different nodes or blocks for fault tolerance3.
This is because if you have 4 TiB of effective capacity with RF2 (which means each data block is replicated twice), then you need 9 TiB of effective capacity with RF3 (which means each data block is replicated three times).
NEW QUESTION # 19
An existing Objects bucket was created for backups with these parameters:
A) WORM policy of three years
B) Versioning policy of two years
C) Lifecycle policy of two years
The customer reports that the cluster is nearly full due to backups created during a recent crypto locker attack. The customer would like to automatically delete backups older than one year to free up space in the cluster.
How should the administrator change settings within Objects?
- A. Modify the existing bucket WORM policy from three years to one year.
- B. Create a new' bucket with the lifecycle policy of one year.
- C. Modify the existing bucket lifecycle policy from two years to one year.
- D. Create a new' bucket with the WORM policy of two years.
Answer: C
Explanation:
According to Nutanix documentation on unified storage (NCP-US) v6, to automatically delete backups older than one year, an administrator should modify the existing bucket lifecycle policy to set the expiration period to one year. Lifecycle policies enable administrators to automate the transition of objects to different storage classes and to expire them altogether. In this scenario, modifying the existing bucket lifecycle policy to shorten the expiration period to one year will ensure that backups older than one year are automatically deleted to free up space in the cluster.
https://portal.nutanix.com/page/documents/details?targetId=Objects-v3_1:v31-lifecycle-policies-rule-c.html
NEW QUESTION # 20
The Compliance department would like the administrator to have the ability to revert documents to previous versions.
How should the administrator facilitate this request?
- A. Configure Protection snapshots on the Share/Export.
- B. Enable Self-Service Restore on the Share/Export.
- C. Configure Protection snapshots on the File Server.
- D. Enable Self-Service Restore on the File Server
Answer: A
Explanation:
Protection snapshots are external snapshots that can be used to recover the file server cluster or individual files and folders1. They can be created through a protection domain schedule or via a user-initiated one-time snapshot of the protection domain1. By configuring protection snapshots on the share/export, the administrator can enable self-service restore for users to revert documents to previous versions2.
https://portal.nutanix.com/page/documents/solutions/details?targetId=TN-2041-Nutanix-Files%3ATN-2041-Nutanix-Files
NEW QUESTION # 21
Which feature ensures that a host failure's impact on a Files cluster will be minimal?
- A. VM-VM affinity rules
- B. VM-VM anti-affinity rules
- C. VM-Host affinity rules
- D. VM-Host anti-affinity rules
Answer: D
Explanation:
These rules ensure that VMs are distributed across different hosts in a cluster, so that if one host fails, the impact on the VMs and their data will be minimal1. Nutanix Files also supports DFS-N (Distributed File System - Namespaces), which allows multiple file servers hosting the same data to support a common folder and provide site affinity for users2.
NEW QUESTION # 22
An administrator is upgrading Objects when the following error message is shown:
type [UPGRADE] : code: 500, message: error in processing pod: application post failed: image update failed: unable to pull docker image 464585393164. dkr. com/nutanix- msp/poseidon-zookeeper:buckets-l.o: err Max retries done: exit status 1 status code: 500 How should the administrator resolve this error?
- A. Manually upload the docker image to the bucket and rerun the upgrade.
- B. Manually upgrade Objects Manager to the latest version.
- C. Upgrade and Objects service via LCM
- D. Perform Inventory then upgrade MSP and Objects Manager vie LCM.
Answer: C
Explanation:
LCM is a framework that automates software upgrades for various components of your Nutanix cluster. MSP is a service that provides authentication, authorization, auditing, and metering for Nutanix services such as Objects. Objects Manager is a web-based interface that allows you to manage your Objects clusters.
NEW QUESTION # 23
What is the reason for the alert: File Server In Heterogeneous State?
- A. Performance of the File Server is optimal, and the alert can be ignored.
- B. The FSVMs are distributed properly on the hosts in the cluster.
- C. The hosts where the FSVMs run do not match in their CPU or memory configuration
- D. The FSVMs do not match in their CPU or memory
Answer: D
Explanation:
According to the Nutanix Files Solution Guide1, all the FSVMs have the same basic configuration: four vCPU and 12 GB of RAM1. However, you can add more vCPU, RAM, and FSVMs to the cluster1.
Based on this information, the alert: File Server In Heterogeneous State indicates that the FSVMs do not match in their CPU or memory configuration1. This could affect the performance and availability of the file server
NEW QUESTION # 24
An administrator is implementing a VDI solution in a Nutanix cluster running AHV. The implementation includes home shares for user files. The shares have to be highly available, only accessible by the named user, and replicated to a DR site.
What solution would best fulfill these requirements?
- A. Nutanix container with Whitelisting configured.
- B. Objects with WORM enabled.
- C. Files with Access Based Enumeration enabled.
- D. Volumes with ISCSI Initiators disabled.
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 25
While preparing for migrating data from a legacy storage environment to a new Files scale-out file server, the administrator make the following notes:
Requirements:
Number of home directories: 4000
Number of Departmental shares: 1
Everyone is permitted to accessing it
All users use the same Departmental share
The administrator deploys Files using the following configuration:
Number of FSVMs: 3
VCPU & RAM/FSVM: 4VCPU,12GB
One Distributed share with SSR & ABE enabled for the Home Directories
One Standard share for the Departmental share
Does this configuration satisfy the project's requirements?
- A. Yes, the listed configuration elements satisfy the requirements.
- B. No, the project needs two distributed Share 4 FSVMs. 6 vCPU & 326B RAM
- C. No, the project needs two distributed 4 FSVMs, 24 vcpu & 128GB RAM
- D. No, the project needs 4 FSVMs 4 vCPU & 12GB RAM.
Answer: A
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the administrator is preparing to migrate data from a legacy storage environment to a new Files scale-out file server in a way that meets the following requirements:
Number of home directories: 4000
Number of Departmental shares: 1
Everyone is permitted to access it
All users use the same Departmental share
The administrator deploys Files using the following configuration:
Number of FSVMs: 3
VCPU & RAM/FSVM: 4VCPU, 12GB
One Distributed share with SSR & ABE enabled for the Home Directories
One Standard share for the Departmental share
Based on this configuration, it appears that the project's requirements are satisfied. The configuration provides a Distributed share for the home directories, which is recommended when there is a large number of files or directories, and this will distribute the load across multiple FSVMs. Note that everyone is permitted to access it.
In addition, the configuration provides a Standard share for the Departmental share, and since all users use the same Departmental share, this will not create any performance issues. Therefore, the correct answer is B, 'Yes, the listed configuration elements satisfy the requirements'.
NEW QUESTION # 26
......
Updated Apr-2023 Pass NCP-US Exam - Real Practice Test Questions: https://www.dumpsfree.com/NCP-US-valid-exam.html
Dumps Moneyack Guarantee - NCP-US Dumps UpTo 90% Off: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1um_OW5tq1PAVZqp0vMmkechK6Qowj4PM